🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of states are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.